RootsCamp: few, but quality

RootsCamp: few, but quality

November 22nd, 2006

Last weekend, I concluded a two-month project called RootsCamp by sitting around various tables with a small group of locals, talking politics. There were some disappointments, of course, mainly tied to the lack of numbers filling the venues. But I’m glad I made the effort. In fact, there was strong support for continuing the idea, perhaps in January for a single session.

Some of the key lessons learned include:

• Like-minded people have a lot of disagreement. The dozen people who attended were all progressive-liberal types of some definition. No students. No Republicans. No cultural diversity. Still, everybody has her own agenda, his own way to make sense of the world. Diversity of any kind is needed for good conversation, and it will surface even in a vanilla group of ideologues.
• When recruiting, there is no substitute for face-to-face conversation. Time and money were big resource constraints for me, but I also recognize that getting out of my office and talking to people about this idea is uncomfortable. Yet, I was at my most effective in explaining the concept when I did so. Blogging, email, web sites … all very important in the process, but they should support the act of looking someone in the eye.
• People will talk about what is important to them. The strength of this self-organizing format is that people are empowered to fill the Big Board with what interests them. Choices and opportunity are key ingredients, and we should actively fight against our own impulses to dictate agendas.
• The web site was an obstacle to entry. The pbwiki site is a bit on the clunky side, as are most wikis. The registration process, which required people to edit a wiki page, was a hurdle (I also accepted email and phone calls). The site also notified all members of every page edit by default, which led to a lot of notification emails for people who didn’t want them. Technology should facilitate, not dictate or interfere.
• There is no “good” day to have a conference. Every day is contended in Bloomington. This particular weekend of RootsCamp had many conflicts … Men’s basketball game on Friday night … IU-Purdue football game on Saturday … parenting conference on Saturday … Last weekend before a major holiday … The release of Wii, which required some to sit in the cold for two days to pick up one of the 45 units Best Buy got Sunday. Advance notice and frequent opportunities can help overcome the hurdles to participation, but there will never be a “perfect” time to do anything.
• Every place, every person, has an embedded identity. I take some pride in the fact that I can stand in a conversation and have people wrinkle their brows trying to place me in an ideology. I am not a Democrat, nor am I Republican. I am progressive, but even that isn’t clearly defined. Still, the fact that I attend, or that I organize forces others to make the attempt to classify me. And in doing so, they react to that classification, whether it is accurate or not. RootsCamp’s national effort is definitely “progressive” in the Democrat sense of the word. Anyone going to the site from the other side of the fence might be chased off by that. Those in attendance are talking about getting local organizations to host a session every month or so. Any location we choose is going to have embedded in it some identity that invokes reactions. The best way to compensate is to identify with a philosophy that can withstand those biases.

What’s Next? … Well, it is difficult to imagine not leaning on these new connections to become engaged in the local political scene. The absence of conservative voices (Republicans were largely defeated in this area in November) makes me want to redouble my efforts to get those people coming to the tables, perhaps starting with a conservative-centered conversation. There are a few tech and research initiatives that came out of the conversations, so I see some tangible things I can do to contribute.

What’s this mean for 3rd Party? … This experience reinforces two central beliefs. First, the best way to engage is locally through establishment of personal connections. Second, diversity exists even within like-minded people. To improve the quality of our political thought, we need to get people with lots of different ideas talking to each other. Not to convince, but to validate their life experiences and make sure they are considered in the action that results from the conversation.

Entry Filed under: Events, State and Local