<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe we should diversify the wiki</title>
	<link>http://3rdparty.org/commentary/platform-in-progress/meta/2006/66</link>
	<description>custom-built by the american people</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: kmakice</title>
		<link>http://3rdparty.org/commentary/platform-in-progress/meta/2006/66#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://3rdparty.org/commentary/platform-in-progress/meta/2006/66#comment-28</guid>
					<description>Well ... I created a &lt;a href=&quot;http://politic.wiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&amp;returntomypage=y&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new wiki space&lt;/a&gt; in Wiki.com anyway. On that page there are links to advantages and disadvantages.

I'd like to try working there for a while, for a couple reasons. Mainly, I like the idea of parallel communities. My &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikisym.org/ws2006/proceedings/p105.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;research on PoliticWiki&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) pointed to the branding of the wiki with our logo as an obstacle to participation. I would rather get many people contributing there in as open and inclusive manner as possible, and then use our site to discuss our own contributions, decide on what we take out of that work, and worry about our organizational needs.

And, it is also a needed excuse to play with the controls of a new wiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230; I created a <a href="http://politic.wiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&#038;returntomypage=y" target="_new" rel="nofollow">new wiki space</a> in Wiki.com anyway. On that page there are links to advantages and disadvantages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to try working there for a while, for a couple reasons. Mainly, I like the idea of parallel communities. My <a href="http://www.wikisym.org/ws2006/proceedings/p105.pdf" rel="nofollow">research on PoliticWiki</a> (PDF) pointed to the branding of the wiki with our logo as an obstacle to participation. I would rather get many people contributing there in as open and inclusive manner as possible, and then use our site to discuss our own contributions, decide on what we take out of that work, and worry about our organizational needs.</p>
<p>And, it is also a needed excuse to play with the controls of a new wiki.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey Poehlmann</title>
		<link>http://3rdparty.org/commentary/platform-in-progress/meta/2006/66#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://3rdparty.org/commentary/platform-in-progress/meta/2006/66#comment-25</guid>
					<description>I'm of the belief that while we can learn from others and share ideas for the benefit of all, it is in the best interest of our particular mission to keep everything under one roof in terms of 3rd Party content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the belief that while we can learn from others and share ideas for the benefit of all, it is in the best interest of our particular mission to keep everything under one roof in terms of 3rd Party content.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
